Kamala Harris delivers a sharp five-word response to Trump’s DOJ indictment of James Comey. Here’s what she said and why it matters.
Table of Contents
Kamala Harris Has a Five-Word Response to the Comey Indictment
Introduction
Former Vice President Kamala Harris, now on tour promoting her new book, has not shied away from weighing in on President Donald Trump’s second term. This week, following the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, Harris offered a fiery reaction — just five words that cut to the heart of her frustration with Trump’s Department of Justice. Her response has quickly gained attention, especially given her background as a seasoned prosecutor.
Harris Reacts to Comey Indictment
When asked by CNN what she thought of Trump’s handling of the Justice Department and the charges against Comey, Harris said bluntly:
“Are you f*ing kidding me?”**
Harris called the indictment both frustrating and painful to see, reflecting her deep concerns about how Trump has used federal power against perceived political enemies.
Harris’ Background Shapes Her View
- Harris has a long legal career as San Francisco District Attorney and California Attorney General.
- She warned during the 2020 campaign that Trump would target political opponents.
- The Comey indictment followed Trump’s public pressure on Attorney General Pam Bondi, who later replaced the U.S. attorney handling the case.
Her background as a prosecutor makes her particularly sensitive to what she views as politically motivated legal actions.
Trump, Bondi, and Political Pressure
Reports surfaced that Trump posted a Truth Social message directly referencing “Pam,” widely interpreted as a demand for action from Attorney General Bondi. While speculation continues about whether it was a private directive, Harris suggested the intent was unmistakable — Trump wanted vengeance against Comey.
Harris told CNN:
“He said it; we knew he would do it. But it is every day unrelenting.”
Harris on “Crossing the Rubicon”
When asked whether Trump’s move represented a historic boundary being crossed, Harris responded cautiously. She did not give a definitive yes or no, instead quipping:
“I don’t know. Define Rubicon.”
This shows both her reluctance to overstate the moment and her recognition of the severity of the Justice Department’s actions under Trump’s direction.
Public and Political Impact
Harris’ sharp words highlight broader concerns about:
- Separation of powers and DOJ independence.
- Use of federal agencies to target political opponents.
- The precedent such moves could set for future administrations.
For Harris, the Comey indictment is not just a legal battle but also a test of American democracy.
FAQs on Kamala Harris and the Comey Indictment
Q1. What was Kamala Harris’ five-word response to the Comey indictment?
Harris reacted by saying: “Are you f**ing kidding me?”* — expressing disbelief and anger at the DOJ’s actions.
Q2. Why does Harris care so much about the Comey case?
As a former prosecutor, Harris believes politically motivated prosecutions undermine the rule of law and justice system integrity.
Q3. How is Attorney General Pam Bondi involved?
Bondi was appointed after Trump pressured for Comey’s indictment. Trump even addressed her directly in a Truth Social post.
Q4. Did Harris predict this would happen?
Yes, during her campaign Harris warned that Trump would weaponize the Justice Department against his opponents.
Q5. What does “crossing the Rubicon” mean in this context?
It refers to crossing a point of no return — Harris acknowledged the seriousness but stopped short of declaring it that moment.
Conclusion
Kamala Harris’ five-word reaction to James Comey’s indictment underscores the deep divide over President Trump’s use of executive power. For Harris, the case represents not just a legal controversy but also a broader warning about threats to democracy.
👉 Do you think the Comey indictment is political payback or a fair application of justice? Share your views in the comments below.