Shocking videos of Charlie Kirk’s shooting and Iryna Zarutska’s stabbing spread rapidly online, raising concerns about violent content, teen safety, and whether social media companies are doing enough to moderate graphic footage.
Table of Contents
Graphic Videos of Kirk and Zarutska Deaths Spark Fierce Debate on Social Media Moderation
In recent weeks, two horrific acts of violence — the assassination of Charlie Kirk in Utah and the stabbing of Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train — have reignited controversy over how social media platforms handle graphic content.
Within minutes of Kirk being shot at a Turning Point event, videos capturing the moment of impact were circulating widely online. Similarly, full surveillance footage of Zarutska’s stabbing was released, quickly spreading across platforms despite its gruesome nature.
These incidents raise an urgent question: Are social media companies doing enough to shield users from traumatic and violent content?
How Graphic Content Spreads Online
Most social media platforms rely on autoplay features to boost engagement, which means sensitive content can appear in feeds without warning.
- Instagram: Videos of Kirk’s shooting appeared as top search results, sometimes autoplaying without content warnings.
- TikTok: Search suggestions like “raw video footage” directed users to graphic clips. The company says it has removed close-up footage but admits some videos are still circulating.
- YouTube: Some violent clips have been taken down, while others remain under news coverage categories.
- Meta (Facebook & Instagram): Applying “Sensitive Content” labels and restricting adult-only accounts, but activists say teens can still access graphic videos.
- X (formerly Twitter): Has not provided detailed responses on its moderation approach.
Despite these efforts, watchdog groups argue the safeguards are inconsistent and ineffective, especially for younger users.
Concerns Over Teen Safety
The Tech Transparency Project tested a teen Instagram account with safety settings enabled — yet violent videos of Kirk’s shooting were still accessible. Katie Paul, the group’s director, warned that Kirk’s popularity among young people made it inevitable that teens would search for related videos, raising the risk of exposure to trauma-inducing content.
Meta acknowledged that variations of the same videos may temporarily bypass filters but insisted its teen safety protections remain intact.
The Mental Health Risks of Exposure
Medical experts warn that constant exposure to violent imagery can cause “vicarious trauma.” This phenomenon occurs when people absorb trauma second-hand, leading to anxiety, stress, and other long-term mental health effects.
Unlike mainstream media, which typically blurs or edits such footage, social media lacks universal standards. With over half of U.S. adults relying on these platforms for news, the potential impact on mental health — especially for adolescents — is significant.
Tech Giants Defend Their Policies
- TikTok: Claimed to be “proactively enforcing guidelines” to remove graphic footage.
- Meta: Said it applies sensitivity warnings and removes content that glorifies violence but admitted moderation delays can occur.
- YouTube: Highlighted its effort to elevate contextual news coverage while removing excessively graphic content.
Still, critics argue the platforms react too slowly, allowing harmful videos to spread virally before they can be flagged or removed.
The Bigger Debate
The flood of graphic videos has reignited a larger debate: Should platforms prioritize freedom of expression or safeguarding public well-being?
Activists argue that tech companies have scaled back moderation in the name of free speech, leaving users vulnerable. On the other hand, some free speech advocates caution that overly strict policies could suppress important evidence of real-world events.
FAQs
Q1: Why are videos of Charlie Kirk’s shooting and Iryna Zarutska’s stabbing so controversial?
Because they are graphic, violent, and spread rapidly on social media — raising questions about user safety, especially for minors.
Q2: What steps are platforms like TikTok and Instagram taking?
They are removing some videos, labeling others as sensitive, and restricting access for teen accounts, though critics say enforcement is inconsistent.
Q3: What is “vicarious trauma”?
It refers to the psychological impact of repeatedly viewing violent or disturbing content, leading to stress, anxiety, and other mental health issues.
Q4: Why do some activists say moderation isn’t working?
Because violent videos often bypass filters, autoplay in feeds, and remain accessible even with teen safety settings activated.